Introduction
As a member of the "next
generation", I grew up playing in Wortroot's creek and woods while my
mother gardened. I never stopped to consider who owned the land
nor why it was available for our use. But when I returned to the
area
after college and was asked to conduct an inventory of the flora and
fauna of the property, I decided it was time to figure out what
Wortroot was all about.
Having conducted two previous inventories, one for a board-run tract of
land, I knew that it was essential that I understand what the owners
want out of the property. I was pleasantly surprised to find,
after passing out a land use survey at the April 26, 2003, board
meeting, that the board members of Wortroot share a common vision for
the land. I have summarized the survey results below.
Multiple
Choice Questions
The multiple choice questions asked people to rate various land use
activities on a scale of 1 to 5. A rating of 1 meant that they
did not
want to see this land use occur at Wortroot while a rating of 5 meant
that they definitely wanted to use Wortroot in this fashion.
Of the fifteen people who filled out the survey, most answered the
multiple choice questions, though not everyone answered every
question.
The results are summarized in the table below.
|
1 - No!
|
2 - Rather not
|
3 - I don't
care
|
4 - Maybe
|
5 - Yes!
|
ATVs
|
100%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Mountain
Biking
|
15%
|
38%
|
31%
|
15%
|
0%
|
Horseback
Riding
|
7%
|
21%
|
43%
|
29%
|
0%
|
Walking/Hiking/Camping
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
93%
|
Practicing
Survival Skills
|
0%
|
0%
|
21%
|
64%
|
14%
|
Caving/Rock-climbing
|
0%
|
0%
|
21%
|
50%
|
29%
|
Meditating/Thinking/Praying
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
93%
|
Researching
the Property's History
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
93%
|
Enjoying the
Property's Beauty
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
100%
|
Studying
Nature
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
100% |
Photographing
Nature
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
20%
|
80%
|
Wildlife
Watching
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
93%
|
Protecting
the Forest in its Natural State
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
93% |
Using the
Property as a Residence
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
33%
|
67%
|
Collecting
Firewood
|
0%
|
7%
|
21%
|
57%
|
14%
|
Gathering
Wild Foods
|
0%
|
0%
|
14%
|
50%
|
36%
|
Hunting
|
36%
|
43%
|
7%
|
14%
|
0%
|
Gardening/Landscaping
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
21%
|
79%
|
Logging
|
86%
|
0%
|
0%
|
7%
|
7%
|
Herb
Gathering
(Ginseng, etc.)
|
0%
|
43%
|
21%
|
21%
|
14%
|
A Maze or
Other Roadside Attraction
|
17%
|
8%
|
67%
|
8%
|
0%
|
Woodland
Cemetery
|
0%
|
8%
|
25%
|
50%
|
17%
|
Sustainable
Agriculture
|
0%
|
0%
|
9%
|
55%
|
36%
|
Buddhist
Meditation Center
|
7%
|
7%
|
36%
|
29%
|
21%
|
The board was in full agreement that Wortroot should be available for
the use of board members and selected community members for the
following uses: walking, hiking, camping, meditating, thinking,
praying, researching the property's history, enjoying the property's
beauty, studying nature, photographing nature, wildlife watching,
protecting the forest in its natural state, using the property as a
residence, gardening, and landscaping.
Most board members were in favor of Wortroot being used for practicing
survival skills, caving, rock-climbing, collecting firewood, gathering
wild foods, and for creating a woodland cemetery or sustainable
agriculture business. Others showed some reservations about these
practices, wanting to ensure that they were only done on a limited
basis, within reason, and without harming the Wortroot property.
Many wanted these land uses to be available to only a limited number of
people, such as residents or for educational purposes.
Board members were a little more wary of mountain biking, horseback
riding, hunting, herb gathering, creating a maze or other roadside
attraction, or creating a Buddhist meditation center at Wortroot.
Very few
were in favor of logging (and then only when it is environmentally
sound, selective, and sustainable) and none wanted to allow ATV use on
the property. (A couple of people noted that an ATV might be
necessary to
carry someone down the hill at some point.)
Essay Questions
Fewer people answered the essay questions than answered the multiple
choice questions. Still, many board members had opinions about
neighbor involvement and about goals and concerns for Wortroot.
In the first essay question, I asked how Wortroot should relate to its
neighbors. Most people wanted Wortroot to have some relationship
with its neighbors, but noted that use of the property by these
neighbors should be
limited and monitored. Specific people should be invited onto the
property for specific events. One respondent wrote "Wortroot
shouldn't be
excluded from the community, but it also shouldn't be exploited.
Seeking community involvement could possibly help maintain Wortroot in
the future." Another respondent wanted us to educate our
neighbors about Wortroot's
goals and history.
Next, I asked people to list their top three goals for Wortroot.
Most people touched on three broad categories - creating a community,
protecting the
land, and providing a place for retreat. Specific goals included:
- continuing as a trust and maintaining the intent of
the trust
- providing a retreat for members
- providing sustenance for members
- providing a community for residents
- connecting with/attracting other local people
- creating opportunities for individuals and groups to
use the land appropriately
- involving the new generation in visioning and
governance
- repaying the founders
- protecting the forest and improving water quality
- removing old property boundary fences
- getting a conservation easement to save tax dollars
and ensure the preservation of the land
- creating a woodland cemetery
Finally, I asked people for their concerns. These included:
- That exploitive activities such as logging, strip mining, oil
drilling, ATV riding, and landfill making could occur here
- Encroaching development
- Adequacy of the existing corporate structure and by-laws to
protect Wortroot
- Not keeping up to date on our legal obligations, such as filing
the correct forms and paying the taxes
- Invasive plants
- Lack of streamside buffers
- Outhouse leaching into the stream
- The house and other structures falling down
- Lack of networking with the neighbors
- Needing the involvement of new people
- Too much exposure
- Too much footdragging by oldsters
- Continued relevance
Mission Statements
Several Wortroot members have written up their own mission statements
for Wortroot. I have included a sampling of them below.
My vision for the farm has evolved over
the nearly 20 years since I first walked into the valley, from the
proverbial "hippie commune" to that of a "wildlife preserve."
I knew when I initially bought the first 96 1/2 acres that I did not
want to be the sole owner/possessor of that property. I asked a
number of people to join with me, and our goal was that of a
self-sufficient community. Many persons did spend months at a
time at the farm; a few of us stayed on for years. Yet the times
changed and energies were redirected. With the onset of the
Reagan era, there seemed little enthusiasm for the communal
lifestyle.
Today, the farmhouse and other structures once occupied see little
activity. Paths, which 10 years ago were tended and traveled,
are covered by bramble and honeysuckle. As the forests mature,
the density of wildlife increases. Compared to neighboring stream
valleys, the watershed of Raccoon Branch is quite extensively
forested. The diversity of plant and animal is consequently
increasing. A part of our goal, I believe, should be to encourage
this diversity. I, therefore, wholeheartedly support John Hart's
suggestion, passed at our last meeting, that we each plan to plant a
native American tree or shrub at the farm next spring.
With regard to our long-term goals, I hope that a marked and mapped
network of trails can be established and maintained, open to use by
organized groups - from the scouts to schools - which will enable a
broader segment of the community to study and enjoy the core
habitat. I think it would be desirable to involve interested
neighbors in this endeavor. With the encroachment of urbanization
and subdivision of farm and woodland, fewer opportunities for
establishing extensive footpaths will exist. By use of the
conservation easement approach, our land trust should seek to broaden
its holdings, first with the recently purchased Baumgartner property,
and perhaps later with adjacent neighbors. We shall need to serve
as a model before we can expect a neighbor to consider sale or donation
of an easement.
In conclusion, it is my goal to live again in the Raccoon Branch
watershed. The establishment and maintenance of footpaths is an
activity which I greatly enjoy. I believe we have moved in the
right direction by involving a core of interested individuals from this
metropolitan area in corporate board activities. Membership in a
number of organizations should be continued: The Nature Conservancy,
Audubon and Sierra Clubs, and the Land Trust Exchange.
-Ken
Marion
To be an outpost and mustering location for the Natural Guard.
To be a preserve for educational, experiential, and experimental
projects.
To be a medium for understanding and instigating harmonious human
interaction with the natural world.
To be a receptive locale for retreat and renewal.
-David Winship
11/16/89
Alvarado, VA
Preserve the natural environment (including trees, plants, wildlife,
water, etc.)
Provide a retreat for people in a limited area.
-Doris
To provide a place where one may
celebrate the outdoors and in so doing learn what it takes to have a
healthy relationship between nature and people.
-Kate
To provide a place where people come home themselves by experiencing
the endangered species, natural wildlife, the outdoors in general and
friends and family.
This can all be expressed for people based on their needs:
-- as a getaway
-- as an experiential learning site
-- as a home/community
-Carol
Questions or comments?
Email:
Last updated 9/04.